Owl calls with IPX7 Waterproof Case

If you are only interested in the owl calls then low pass filtering the 48kHz recording, or recording at 8kHz, would significantly reduce the noise floor as it increases the oversample rate by a factor of 6.

The slight amplification of the high pitched calls was what we observed last year when trialling the case for bird song. It might be interesting to try the case without a vent also. We were hoping to be able to use a test lab at the University of Southampton to do a real comparison last summer but the lockdown prevented us from doing that.

I repeated the test after allowing the case to settle for a good 13 hours (though the membrane already went flabby a few minutes after closing). Done with playback of Ural owl (Strix uralensis) and common chaffinch (Fringilla coelebs) calls, the loudspeaker was directly facing the recorder ~2.3 m away, with Ural owl call at approx. 85 dB RMS at 1m. Both sounds were first played at an enclosed recorder, then at the same recorder free-standing on a desk. It was set at maximum gain and 48 kbps sampling rate. Again, the case attenuated the owl's call by 20 dB, whereas the finch's call was amplified by 4 dB this time. This forum won't let me attach a picture, so I uploaded it to https://www.nib.si/images/stories/EKOS/comparison.jpg It shows oscillograms and spectrograms of all mentioned calls, pasted together (same scale throughout). We'll try putting out recorders in pairs - one enclosed and one in a ziplock bag - at our monitoring locations next week, to see what we get outside. But from what I've seen, it looks like the official cases aren't fit for our purpose, unfortunately. We'll also try one of the 3-d printed designs later, but it might take a while to get all the pieces.

Did you manage to measure some time after the case closure? The over pressure of closing the case definitely seems to increase the attenuation at low frequency and then this reduces as the pressure equalises over a few hours.